mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-01 13:03:25 +01:00
blk-ioc: fix recursive spin_lock/unlock_irq() in ioc_clear_queue()
Recursive spin_lock/unlock_irq() is not safe, because spin_unlock_irq()
will enable irq unconditionally:
spin_lock_irq queue_lock -> disable irq
spin_lock_irq ioc->lock
spin_unlock_irq ioc->lock -> enable irq
/*
* AA dead lock will be triggered if current context is preempted by irq,
* and irq try to hold queue_lock again.
*/
spin_unlock_irq queue_lock
Fix this problem by using spin_lock/unlock() directly for 'ioc->lock'.
Fixes: 5a0ac57c48
("blk-ioc: protect ioc_destroy_icq() by 'queue_lock'")
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230606011438.3743440-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f12bc113ce
commit
a7cfa0af0c
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -179,9 +179,9 @@ void ioc_clear_queue(struct request_queue *q)
|
|||
* Other context won't hold ioc lock to wait for queue_lock, see
|
||||
* details in ioc_release_fn().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(&icq->ioc->lock);
|
||||
spin_lock(&icq->ioc->lock);
|
||||
ioc_destroy_icq(icq);
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&icq->ioc->lock);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&icq->ioc->lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue